State v. Earley, Unpublished Decision (11-7-2003)
Opinion
{¶ 2} Earley filed a timely notice of appeal, and in due course, his appointed appellate counsel filed an Anders brief, alleging that after thoroughly examining the record and the law, he concluded that there were no meritorious issues for appeal. On June 19, 2003 we informed Earley that his counsel had filed an Anders brief on his behalf, and we granted him sixty days from that date to file a pro se brief if he so desired. No such pro se brief has been filed.
{¶ 3} We have thoroughly examined the record of the proceedings in this case, and we agree with the assessment of appellate counsel that there are no meritorious issues for appellate review. The judgment appealed from is Affirmed.
Wolff, J., and Young, J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2003 Ohio 5959 (State v. Earley, Unpublished Decision (11-7-2003)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.