State v. Earl

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Earl

514 S.W.3d 93, 2017 WL 1149135, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 246

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 28, 2017

DocketWD 79443

StatusPublished

This text of 514 S.W.3d 93 (State v. Earl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Earl, 514 S.W.3d 93, 2017 WL 1149135, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 246 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam:

Mr. Arthur Earl appeals his convictions of one count of first-degree statutory sodomy and one count of first-degree child molestation following a jury trial. Mr. Earl contends that the trial court erred in admitting his statement to law enforcement because he alleges the statement was made involuntarily. There being no prece-dential value in our ruling, we have instead provided the parties with a legal memorandum explaining our ruling. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

Per Curiam:

Mr. Arthur Earl appeals his convictions of one count of first-degree statutory sodomy and one count of first-degree child molestation following a jury trial. Mr. Earl contends that the trial court erred in admitting his statement to law enforcement because he alleges the statement was made involuntarily. There being no prece-dential value in our ruling, we have instead provided the parties with a legal memorandum explaining our ruling. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

514 S.W.3d 93, 2017 WL 1149135, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-earl-moctapp-2017.