State v. Earl

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Earl

514 S.W.3d 93, 2017 WL 1149135, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 246

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 28, 2017·No. WD 79443·Published

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam:

Mr. Arthur Earl appeals his convictions of one count of first-degree statutory sodomy and one count of first-degree child molestation following a jury trial. Mr. Earl contends that the trial court erred in admitting his statement to law enforcement because he alleges the statement was made involuntarily. There being no prece-dential value in our ruling, we have instead provided the parties with a legal memorandum explaining our ruling. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

Per Curiam:

Mr. Arthur Earl appeals his convictions of one count of first-degree statutory sodomy and one count of first-degree child molestation following a jury trial. Mr. Earl contends that the trial court erred in admitting his statement to law enforcement because he alleges the statement was made involuntarily. There being no prece-dential value in our ruling, we have instead provided the parties with a legal memorandum explaining our ruling. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Earl, 514 S.W.3d 93, 2017 WL 1149135, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 246 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

514 S.W.3d 93 (State v. Earl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.