State v. Eadus
This text of 298 Mont. 86 (State v. Eadus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On July 9,1999, the defendant was sentenced to a five (5) year commitment to the Department of Corrections, with credit for 268 days spent incarcerated prior to sentencing.
On November 4, 1999, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was considered by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The defendant was present and was represented by Kristina Guest. The state was represented by Daniel Schwarz.
Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also to increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.
Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division provides: “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (Section 45-18-904(3), MCA.) The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.
After careful consideration, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.
Done in open Court this 4th day of November, 1999.
DATED this 6th day of December, 1999.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
298 Mont. 86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-eadus-mont-1999.