State v. E. W. B.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. E. W. B.

324 P.3d 557, 262 Or. App. 234

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedApril 9, 2014

Docket130969181; A155311

StatusPublished

This text of 324 P.3d 557 (State v. E. W. B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. E. W. B., 324 P.3d 557, 262 Or. App. 234 (Or. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. He contends that the trial court erred in concluding that, as a result of a mental disorder, he is unable to provide for his basic personal needs. See ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the record does not contain legally sufficient evidence to support the involuntary commitment and that the trial court’s order should be reversed. We agree and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. He contends that the trial court erred in concluding that, as a result of a mental disorder, he is unable to provide for his basic personal needs. See ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the record does not contain legally sufficient evidence to support the involuntary commitment and that the trial court’s order should be reversed. We agree and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

324 P.3d 557, 262 Or. App. 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-e-w-b-orctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack