State v. E. N. W.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. E. N. W.

156 P.3d 144, 211 Or. App. 707, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 487

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedApril 4, 2007

Docket060666048; A132748

StatusPublished

This text of 156 P.3d 144 (State v. E. N. W.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. E. N. W., 156 P.3d 144, 211 Or. App. 707, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 487 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that he is presently a danger to himself or others because of a mental disorder. The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. On de novo review of the record, we accept the state’s concession and reverse.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that he is presently a danger to himself or others because of a mental disorder. The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. On de novo review of the record, we accept the state’s concession and reverse.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

156 P.3d 144, 211 Or. App. 707, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-e-n-w-orctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack