State v. E. H. B.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. E. H. B.

210 P.3d 928, 229 Or. App. 176, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 811

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJune 17, 2009

Docket08143MC; A138451

StatusPublished

This text of 210 P.3d 928 (State v. E. H. B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. E. H. B., 210 P.3d 928, 229 Or. App. 176, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 811 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant contends that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is unable to provide for her basic needs as the result of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(l)(d). The state concedes that the record does not contain evidence sufficient to support the involuntary commitment. On de novo review, we accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant contends that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is unable to provide for her basic needs as the result of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(l)(d). The state concedes that the record does not contain evidence sufficient to support the involuntary commitment. On de novo review, we accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

210 P.3d 928, 229 Or. App. 176, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-e-h-b-orctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack