State v. E. G.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. E. G.

456 P.3d 383, 301 Or. App. 759

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJanuary 15, 2020

DocketA170981

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 456 P.3d 383 (State v. E. G.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. E. G., 456 P.3d 383, 301 Or. App. 759 (Or. Ct. App. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

Submitted December 6, 2019, reversed January 15, 2020

In the Matter of E. G., a Person Alleged to have Mental Illness. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. E. G., Appellant. Clackamas County Circuit Court 19CC02304; A170981 456 P3d 383

Colleen F. Gilmartin, Judge pro tempore. Jedediah Peterson and O’Connor Weber LLC filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Judy C. Lucas, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and Egan, Chief Judge, and Powers, Judge. PER CURIAM Reversed. 760 State v. E. G.

PER CURIAM The trial court committed appellant to the custody of the Mental Health Division for a period not to exceed 180 days based on a determination that he was a danger to others and was unable to provide for his basic personal needs. ORS 426.005(1)(f)(A), (B). Appellant contends that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence to support the court’s conclusion that he is a danger to others or unable to provide for his basic personal needs. The state concedes that the record is legally insufficient in that regard and that the judgment of commitment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse the com- mitment order. Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Submitted December 6, 2019, reversed January 15, 2020

In the Matter of E. G., a Person Alleged to have Mental Illness. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. E. G., Appellant. Clackamas County Circuit Court 19CC02304; A170981 456 P3d 383

Colleen F. Gilmartin, Judge pro tempore. Jedediah Peterson and O’Connor Weber LLC filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Judy C. Lucas, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and Egan, Chief Judge, and Powers, Judge. PER CURIAM Reversed. 760 State v. E. G.

PER CURIAM The trial court committed appellant to the custody of the Mental Health Division for a period not to exceed 180 days based on a determination that he was a danger to others and was unable to provide for his basic personal needs. ORS 426.005(1)(f)(A), (B). Appellant contends that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence to support the court’s conclusion that he is a danger to others or unable to provide for his basic personal needs. The state concedes that the record is legally insufficient in that regard and that the judgment of commitment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse the com- mitment order. Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

456 P.3d 383, 301 Or. App. 759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-e-g-orctapp-2020.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack