State v. E. B.
This text of 276 P.3d 285 (State v. E. B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant seeks reversal of the trial court’s judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. She contends that the trial court erred in concluding that she is unable to provide for her basic needs as the result of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(1). The state concedes that the record does not contain legally sufficient evidence to support the involuntary commitment and that the trial court’s judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
276 P.3d 285, 249 Or. App. 523, 2012 WL 1431658, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-e-b-orctapp-2012.