State v. Dynes

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Dynes

101 S.W.3d 342, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 476, 2003 WL 1701879

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 1, 2003·No. ED 81071·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Ceasar Dynes (“defendant”) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, following a jury trial, finding him guilty of robbery in the first degree, section 569.020 RSMo 2000 1 and armed criminal action, section 571.015. Defendant was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to two concurrent terms of fifteen years imprisonment. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Ceasar Dynes (“defendant”) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, following a jury trial, finding him guilty of robbery in the first degree, section 569.020 RSMo 2000 1 and armed criminal action, section 571.015. Defendant was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to two concurrent terms of fifteen years imprisonment. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise indicated.

State v. Dynes, 101 S.W.3d 342, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 476, 2003 WL 1701879 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

101 S.W.3d 342 (State v. Dynes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related