State v. Dye

2017 Ohio 644, 69 N.E.3d 752, 148 Ohio St. 3d 1413
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 23, 2017
Docket2017-0100
StatusPublished

This text of 2017 Ohio 644 (State v. Dye) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Dye, 2017 Ohio 644, 69 N.E.3d 752, 148 Ohio St. 3d 1413 (Ohio 2017).

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 103907, 2016-Ohio-8044. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal.

Upon consideration of the motion for admission pro hac vice of Allen Bloom, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. XII(4), counsel shall file a notice of permission to appear pro hac vice with the Supreme Court’s Office of Attorney Services within 30 days of the date of this entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Dye
2016 Ohio 8044 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 Ohio 644, 69 N.E.3d 752, 148 Ohio St. 3d 1413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dye-ohio-2017.