State v. Duzan

6 Blackf. 31
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1841
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 6 Blackf. 31 (State v. Duzan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Duzan, 6 Blackf. 31 (Ind. 1841).

Opinion

Blackford, J.

Indictment. The charge is, that on, &c., at, &c., and on divers other days and times, &c., the defendant did then and there unlawfully carry concealed in his pocket a certain dangerous weapon, viz., a certain pistol, he not being a traveler; contrary to the statute, &c. The Circuit Court, on the defendant’s motion, quashed the indictment.

We think this indictment is good. The objection, that the [34]*34pistol is not stated, to have been loaded, is insufficient. The statute says, “ that every person, &c., who shall wear or carry any dirk, pistol, sword in cane, or other dangerous weapon concealed, shall &c.” Rev. Stat., 1838, p. 217. The statute does not require that the pistol should be loaded.

H. (yNeal, for the State. W. Quarles and C, C. Nave, for the defendant.

*Per Curiam.—The judgment is reversed with costs.

Cause remanded, &c.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Padilla
45 P.R. 264 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1933)
Pueblo v. Padilla
45 P.R. Dec. 273 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1933)
State v. Wardlaw
43 Ark. 73 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1884)
Atwood v. State
53 Ala. 508 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1875)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Blackf. 31, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-duzan-ind-1841.