State v. Duvall
This text of 4 H. & McH. 4 (State v. Duvall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering General Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The generar oourt quashed the writ of certiorari, quia irregulariter emanavit.
The question then occurred whether or not the person suing out the writ of certiorari was to pay the costs.
Shaaff contended that the person suing out the certiorari is’ not to pay the costs in certain cases; he cited 1 Bac. ab. 517. Statute of 8 and 9 W. and M. Salk. 194. and Sayman’s costs, 164. If the plaintiff quash his own writ, the. defendant shall not have costs.
The court reserved the point for a future decision.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 H. & McH. 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-duvall-vagensess-1797.