State v. Duryee

48 N.J.L. 372, 1886 N.J. LEXIS 27
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 15, 1886
StatusPublished

This text of 48 N.J.L. 372 (State v. Duryee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Duryee, 48 N.J.L. 372, 1886 N.J. LEXIS 27 (N.J. 1886).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court should be reversed.

For affirmance—Hone.

For reversal—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dixon, Knapp, Van Syckel, Brown, Clement, Cole, Paterson, Whitaker. 10.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 N.J.L. 372, 1886 N.J. LEXIS 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-duryee-nj-1886.