State v. Durr

202 So. 3d 996, 2016 La. LEXIS 2146
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 2, 2016·No. No. 2015-KP-1735·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

11Writ granted. The District Court erred when it rejected the Commissioner’s Recommendation that it order DNA testing conducted in relator’s case. See, e.g., State v. Debrow, 13-1814 (La. 5/23/14), 138 So.3d 1229; State ex rel. Ford v. State, 12-1860 (La. 2/8/13), 107 So.3d 640; State ex rel. Tran v. State, 12-1275 (La. 10/8/12), 99 So.3d 1005; State ex rel. Jackson v. State, 11-0394 (La. 5/25/12), 90 So.3d 384; State v. Stokes, 10-1387 (La. 2/11/11), 56 So.3d 1008.

KNOLL, J., would deny. CLARK, J., dissents and assigns reasons. CRICHTON, J., would deny.

|, KNOLL, J., would deny.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Durr, 202 So. 3d 996, 2016 La. LEXIS 2146 (La. 2016).

202 So. 3d 996 (State v. Durr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Stokes
56 So. 3d 1008 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2011)