State v. Durr

202 So. 3d 996, 2016 La. LEXIS 2146
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedNovember 2, 2016
DocketNo. 2015-KP-1735
StatusPublished

This text of 202 So. 3d 996 (State v. Durr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Durr, 202 So. 3d 996, 2016 La. LEXIS 2146 (La. 2016).

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

11Writ granted. The District Court erred when it rejected the Commissioner’s Recommendation that it order DNA testing conducted in relator’s case. See, e.g., State v. Debrow, 13-1814 (La. 5/23/14), 138 So.3d 1229; State ex rel. Ford v. State, 12-1860 (La. 2/8/13), 107 So.3d 640; State ex rel. Tran v. State, 12-1275 (La. 10/8/12), 99 So.3d 1005; State ex rel. Jackson v. State, 11-0394 (La. 5/25/12), 90 So.3d 384; State v. Stokes, 10-1387 (La. 2/11/11), 56 So.3d 1008.

KNOLL, J., would deny. CLARK, J., dissents and assigns reasons. CRICHTON, J., would deny.

|, KNOLL, J., would deny.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Stokes
56 So. 3d 1008 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
202 So. 3d 996, 2016 La. LEXIS 2146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-durr-la-2016.