State v. Durning

221 So. 3d 846, 2017 WL 2610637, 2017 La. LEXIS 1287
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided June 16, 2017·No. No. 2017-KK-0690·Published

Opinion

CRICHTON, J.,

would grant and assigns reasons:.

hi would' grant the State’s writ application. The defendant is charged with committing the crime of cyberstalking. The State filed a Notice, of Res Gestae, seeking to introduce two consent judgments that (i) enjoin defendant from harassing, stalking, following, or threatening the victim, and (ii) terminate the- defendant’s parental authority over his child with the victim. But res gestae evidence- does not typically require notice and, in any event, I question the .accuracy of using that legal: term. Instead, I would treat .the State’s Notice-of Res Gestae as a motion in limine regarding admissibility; and, in my view, the consent judgments are clearly admissible [847] in this bench trial as either a party admission or a judicial declaration.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Durning, 221 So. 3d 846, 2017 WL 2610637, 2017 La. LEXIS 1287 (La. 2017).

221 So. 3d 846 (State v. Durning) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.