State v. . Durham
124 S.E. 926, 188 N.C. 823, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 204
This text of 124 S.E. 926 (State v. . Durham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. . Durham, 124 S.E. 926, 188 N.C. 823, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 204 (N.C. 1924).
Opinion
Tbe defendant was indicted for a violation of tbe prohibition law. Tbe assignments of error relate to tbe judge’s refusal to dismiss tbe action as in case of nonsuit and to set aside tbe verdict.
His Honor’s ruling was obviously correct. S. v. Sykes, 180 N. C., 679.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. . Sykes
104 S.E. 83 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1920)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
124 S.E. 926, 188 N.C. 823, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-durham-nc-1924.