State v. . Durham
124 S.E. 926, 188 N.C. 823, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 204
Opinion
Tbe defendant was indicted for a violation of tbe prohibition law. Tbe assignments of error relate to tbe judge’s refusal to dismiss tbe action as in case of nonsuit and to set aside tbe verdict.
His Honor’s ruling was obviously correct. S. v. Sykes, 180 N. C., 679.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. . Durham, 124 S.E. 926, 188 N.C. 823, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 204 (N.C. 1924).
124 S.E. 926 (State v. . Durham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. . Sykes
104 S.E. 83 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1920)