State v. Durham

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Durham

532 S.W.3d 743

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 31, 2017·No. No. ED 104876·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Per Curiam

Dayton Durham (“Appellant”) appeals from the judgment entered after a jury trial on his convictions for two counts of first-degree Statutory sodomy, enticement of a child, first-degree child molestation and first-degree child endangerment. We find no abu'se of discretion in the admission of the challenged evidencé and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedehtial value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Per Curiam

Dayton Durham (“Appellant”) appeals from the judgment entered after a jury trial on his convictions for two counts of first-degree Statutory sodomy, enticement of a child, first-degree child molestation and first-degree child endangerment. We find no abu'se of discretion in the admission of the challenged evidencé and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedehtial value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Durham, 532 S.W.3d 743 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

532 S.W.3d 743 (State v. Durham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.