State v. Durham

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Durham

532 S.W.3d 743

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 31, 2017

DocketNo. ED 104876

StatusPublished

This text of 532 S.W.3d 743 (State v. Durham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Durham, 532 S.W.3d 743 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Per Curiam

Dayton Durham (“Appellant”) appeals from the judgment entered after a jury trial on his convictions for two counts of first-degree Statutory sodomy, enticement of a child, first-degree child molestation and first-degree child endangerment. We find no abu'se of discretion in the admission of the challenged evidencé and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedehtial value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Per Curiam

Dayton Durham (“Appellant”) appeals from the judgment entered after a jury trial on his convictions for two counts of first-degree Statutory sodomy, enticement of a child, first-degree child molestation and first-degree child endangerment. We find no abu'se of discretion in the admission of the challenged evidencé and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedehtial value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

532 S.W.3d 743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-durham-moctapp-2017.