State v. Durham

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Durham

869 S.W.2d 871, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 150, 1994 WL 25086

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Durham. Read the opinion of the Court — 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1708 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 1, 1994·No. Nos. 61185, 62654·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In a jury-tried case, defendant was convicted of two counts of first degree robbery in violation of § 569.020, RSMo 1986, and one count of first degree burglary in violation of § 569.160, RSMo 1986. He appeals the judgments entered on those convictions. He also appeals the denial of his post-conviction motion.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In a jury-tried case, defendant was convicted of two counts of first degree robbery in violation of § 569.020, RSMo 1986, and one count of first degree burglary in violation of § 569.160, RSMo 1986. He appeals the judgments entered on those convictions. He also appeals the denial of his post-conviction motion.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

State v. Durham, 869 S.W.2d 871, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 150, 1994 WL 25086 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

869 S.W.2d 871 (State v. Durham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.