State v. Durenleau

Supreme Court of Vermont

State v. Durenleau

657 A.2d 170, 161 Vt. 602, 1994 Vt. LEXIS 1

CourtSupreme Court of Vermont

DecidedJanuary 6, 1994

DocketNo. 93-168

StatusPublished

This text of 657 A.2d 170 (State v. Durenleau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Durenleau, 657 A.2d 170, 161 Vt. 602, 1994 Vt. LEXIS 1 (Vt. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Defendant’s alternative motion to remand is denied. Defendant first must bring her motion for new trial before the trial court. After the trial court has considered defendant’s claim of newly discovered evidence, the court may either deny the motion or certify to this Court its intention to grant the motion. If the trial court makes the latter certification to this Court, at that time, this Court would consider a new motion to remand by the defendant. See United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648, 667 n.42 (1984) (detailing procedure under identical terms of Fed. R. Crim. P. 33); see also 3 C. Wright, Federal Practice & Procedure § 557, at 338-40 (2d ed. 1982 & Supp. 1993) (discussing procedure under Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 and collecting cases).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendant’s alternative motion to remand is denied. Defendant first must bring her motion for new trial before the trial court. After the trial court has considered defendant’s claim of newly discovered evidence, the court may either deny the motion or certify to this Court its intention to grant the motion. If the trial court makes the latter certification to this Court, at that time, this Court would consider a new motion to remand by the defendant. See United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648, 667 n.42 (1984) (detailing procedure under identical terms of Fed. R. Crim. P. 33); see also 3 C. Wright, Federal Practice & Procedure § 557, at 338-40 (2d ed. 1982 & Supp. 1993) (discussing procedure under Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 and collecting cases).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

657 A.2d 170, 161 Vt. 602, 1994 Vt. LEXIS 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-durenleau-vt-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack