State v. Dupart

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Dupart

745 So. 2d 623, 1999 La. LEXIS 1745, 1999 WL 511150

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 25, 1999

DocketNo. 99-K-0558

StatusPublished

This text of 745 So. 2d 623 (State v. Dupart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Dupart, 745 So. 2d 623, 1999 La. LEXIS 1745, 1999 WL 511150 (La. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

IN RE: State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff(s); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review; Parish of Orleans Criminal District Court Div. “G” Number 352-175; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Number 98KA-0580

Writ granted. Because documents the state enclose’ with its application indicate that it complied with the statutory notice provisions of R.S. 40:2608, which provisions themselves comply with constitutional requirements, see Robinson v. Honrahan, 409 U.S. 38, 39-40, 93 S.Ct. 30, 31, 34 L.Ed.2d 47 (1972); State v. $1,4-80, 92-2808, p. 3 (La.App. 4th Cir.5/26/94), 637 So.2d 1255, 1257, the judgments of the district court and court of appeal are reversed and the 1992 forfeiture judgment is reinstated.

CALOGERO, C.J., would grant the docket. LEMMON, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN RE: State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff(s); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review; Parish of Orleans Criminal District Court Div. “G” Number 352-175; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Number 98KA-0580

Writ granted. Because documents the state enclose’ with its application indicate that it complied with the statutory notice provisions of R.S. 40:2608, which provisions themselves comply with constitutional requirements, see Robinson v. Honrahan, 409 U.S. 38, 39-40, 93 S.Ct. 30, 31, 34 L.Ed.2d 47 (1972); State v. $1,4-80, 92-2808, p. 3 (La.App. 4th Cir.5/26/94), 637 So.2d 1255, 1257, the judgments of the district court and court of appeal are reversed and the 1992 forfeiture judgment is reinstated.

CALOGERO, C.J., would grant the docket. LEMMON, J., not on panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

745 So. 2d 623, 1999 La. LEXIS 1745, 1999 WL 511150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dupart-la-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack