State v. Dunphy

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

State v. Dunphy

518 A.2d 453, 1986 Me. LEXIS 939

DecidedDecember 5, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 518 A.2d 453 (State v. Dunphy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Dunphy, 518 A.2d 453, 1986 Me. LEXIS 939 (Me. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Defendant Daniel Dunphy appeals from a conviction of assault, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 207 (1983) following a jury-waived trial in Superior Court (Penobscot County). On appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, we conclude that the single justice could rationally find beyond a reasonable doubt every element of the of[454]*454fense charged. State v. Barry, 495 A.2d 825, 826 (Me.1985).

The remaining issues raised on appeal are without merit and require no discussion.

The entry is:

Judgment of conviction affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI