State v. Dunn
140 A. 922, 104 N.J.L. 448, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 236
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Parker, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Dunn, 140 A. 922, 104 N.J.L. 448, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 236 (N.J. 1928).
140 A. 922 (State v. Dunn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.