State v. Dunn
This text of 195 S.E.2d 131 (State v. Dunn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The trial court was properly organized and had jurisdiction of the defendant and the subject matter. The bill of indictment was proper in form. Defendant was duly arraigned upon the charge of common law robbery and entered a plea of not guilty. The evidence was sufficient to be submitted to the jury, the verdict of the jury was proper in form, and the judgment was correctly entered. The sentence imposed does not exceed the maximum allowed by law.
In our opinion, defendant had a fair trial which was free from prejudicial error.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
195 S.E.2d 131, 17 N.C. App. 728, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dunn-ncctapp-1973.