State v. . Dunn

74 S.E. 359, 158 N.C. 654, 1912 N.C. LEXIS 109
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedApril 3, 1912
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 74 S.E. 359 (State v. . Dunn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Dunn, 74 S.E. 359, 158 N.C. 654, 1912 N.C. LEXIS 109 (N.C. 1912).

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

"We have examined all of the exceptions of the defendant, and find no error which entitles the defendant to a new trial.

Many of the objections to evidence were entered as a matter of precaution, and in the earnest effort of counsel to protect the rights of the defendant, but they present no new questions requiring discussion.

■ The indictment is fully sustained in S. v. Dowdy, 145 N. C., 432, and his Honor followed S. v. McIntyre, 139 N. C., 601, as to the effect of the statute, applicable to Cumberland County, making the possession of a certain quantity of intoxicating liquors prima facie évidence of guilt.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

S. v. . Wilkerson
79 S.E. 888 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1913)
State v. Wilkerson
164 N.C. 431 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1913)
S. v. . Watkins
79 S.E. 619 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1913)
State v. Watkins
164 N.C. 425 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 S.E. 359, 158 N.C. 654, 1912 N.C. LEXIS 109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dunn-nc-1912.