State v. Dunn

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Dunn

540 S.W.3d 443

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 20, 2018

DocketNo. ED 105137

StatusPublished

This text of 540 S.W.3d 443 (State v. Dunn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Dunn, 540 S.W.3d 443 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James M. Dunn ("Defendant") was charged with the class C felony of possession of a controlled substance pursuant to § 195.202. After reviewing the record, we find that (1) the trial court did not plainly err by failing to strike certain testimony sua sponte and (2) there was sufficient evidence to establish that Defendant "possessed" methamphetamine and he was *444aware of the nature and character of the illegal substance. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

James M. Dunn ("Defendant") was charged with the class C felony of possession of a controlled substance pursuant to § 195.202. After reviewing the record, we find that (1) the trial court did not plainly err by failing to strike certain testimony sua sponte and (2) there was sufficient evidence to establish that Defendant "possessed" methamphetamine and he was *444aware of the nature and character of the illegal substance. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

540 S.W.3d 443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dunn-moctapp-2018.