State v. Dunn

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Dunn

540 S.W.3d 443

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 20, 2018·No. No. ED 105137·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James M. Dunn ("Defendant") was charged with the class C felony of possession of a controlled substance pursuant to § 195.202. After reviewing the record, we find that (1) the trial court did not plainly err by failing to strike certain testimony sua sponte and (2) there was sufficient evidence to establish that Defendant "possessed" methamphetamine and he was *444aware of the nature and character of the illegal substance. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

James M. Dunn ("Defendant") was charged with the class C felony of possession of a controlled substance pursuant to § 195.202. After reviewing the record, we find that (1) the trial court did not plainly err by failing to strike certain testimony sua sponte and (2) there was sufficient evidence to establish that Defendant "possessed" methamphetamine and he was *444aware of the nature and character of the illegal substance. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Dunn, 540 S.W.3d 443 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

540 S.W.3d 443 (State v. Dunn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.