State v. Dunn
277 S.W.3d 848, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 106, 2009 WL 532408
Opinion
ORDER
Defendant, Edward T. Dunn, appeals from the judgment entered after the court found him guilty of driving while intoxicated and driving while revoked. On appeal, defendant argues that the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was guilty of driving while intoxicated.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for them information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. We affirm the judgment. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Dunn, 277 S.W.3d 848, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 106, 2009 WL 532408 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
277 S.W.3d 848 (State v. Dunn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Williams
277 S.W.3d 848 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)