State v. Dunn

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Dunn

277 S.W.3d 848, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 106, 2009 WL 532408

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 3, 2009

DocketED 90930

StatusPublished

This text of 277 S.W.3d 848 (State v. Dunn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Dunn, 277 S.W.3d 848, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 106, 2009 WL 532408 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Edward T. Dunn, appeals from the judgment entered after the court found him guilty of driving while intoxicated and driving while revoked. On appeal, defendant argues that the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was guilty of driving while intoxicated.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for them information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. We affirm the judgment. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Edward T. Dunn, appeals from the judgment entered after the court found him guilty of driving while intoxicated and driving while revoked. On appeal, defendant argues that the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was guilty of driving while intoxicated.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for them information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. We affirm the judgment. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 S.W.3d 848, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 106, 2009 WL 532408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dunn-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack