State v. Dunn

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Dunn

901 S.W.2d 352, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1250, 1995 WL 392003

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 30, 1995

DocketNo. 67118

StatusPublished

This text of 901 S.W.2d 352 (State v. Dunn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Dunn, 901 S.W.2d 352, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1250, 1995 WL 392003 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the judgment following his conviction by a jury of assault in the third degree, § 565.070 RSMo 1994, for which he was fined $500. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. A written opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. We therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the judgment following his conviction by a jury of assault in the third degree, § 565.070 RSMo 1994, for which he was fined $500. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. A written opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. We therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

901 S.W.2d 352, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1250, 1995 WL 392003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dunn-moctapp-1995.