State v. Dunn

970 So. 2d 922, 2007 WL 4561580
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 31, 2007·No. 1D07-0299·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

970 So.2d 922 (2007)

STATE of Florida, Appellant,
v.
Kelvin L. DUNN, Appellee.

No. 1D07-0299.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 31, 2007.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Thomas D. Winokur, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and David P. Gauldin, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Because the trial court failed to make any written or oral findings to support the downward departure sentence, the sentence is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED to the trial court for resentencing. If the trial court wishes to depart downward from the lowest permissible sentence indicated on the Criminal Punishment Code scoresheet, under section 921.00265(2), Florida Statutes, it must announce on the record a valid reason for so doing. State v. Carlson, 911 So.2d 234 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); State v. Marshall, 869 So.2d 754 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

BARFIELD, WOLF, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Dunn, 970 So. 2d 922, 2007 WL 4561580 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

970 So. 2d 922 (State v. Dunn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Dunn
9 So. 3d 666 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)