State v. Dunlap
242 P. 449, 31 N.M. 275
New Mexico Supreme Court·Decided December 14, 1925·No. No. 2968; No. 2969; No. 2979; No. 2983; No. 2993; No. 3040; No. 3041·Published
Opinion
Each of the defendants in the above-entitled causes was convicted under sections 1 and 2, c. 118, Laws, of 1923, which, as we have just held in State v. Armstrong, No. 2947, 242 P. 440, not as yet [officially] reported, are violative of section 18, art. 4, of the Constitution of this state. The judgment in each of said causes must therefore be reversed and remanded, with direction to discharge the accused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Dunlap, 242 P. 449, 31 N.M. 275 (N.M. 1925).
242 P. 449 (State v. Dunlap) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Harvey
242 P. 440 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1926)