State v. Dunlap

New Mexico Supreme Court

State v. Dunlap

242 P. 449, 31 N.M. 275

CourtNew Mexico Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 14, 1925

DocketNos. 2968, 2969, 2979, 2983, 2993, 3040, 3041.

StatusPublished

This text of 242 P. 449 (State v. Dunlap) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Mexico Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Dunlap, 242 P. 449, 31 N.M. 275 (N.M. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Each of the defendants in the above-entitled causes was convicted under sections 1 and 2, c. 118, Laws of 1923, which, as we have just held in State v. Armstrong, No. 2947, 242 P. 440, not as yet [officially] reported, are violative of section 18, art. 4, of the Constitution of this state. The judgment in each of said causes must therefore be reversed and remanded, with direction to discharge the accused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Each of the defendants in the above-entitled causes was convicted under sections 1 and 2, c. 118, Laws of 1923, which, as we have just held in State v. Armstrong, No. 2947, 242 P. 440, not as yet [officially] reported, are violative of section 18, art. 4, of the Constitution of this state. The judgment in each of said causes must therefore be reversed and remanded, with direction to discharge the accused.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 P. 449, 31 N.M. 275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dunlap-nm-1925.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack