State v. Dunham

Texas Supreme Court

State v. Dunham

34 Tex. 675

DecidedJuly 1, 1871

StatusPublished

This text of 34 Tex. 675 (State v. Dunham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Dunham, 34 Tex. 675 (Tex. 1871).

Pincite

Opinion

■Oseen, J.

The defendant below was indicted for willfully taking up and trading off, to Morgan Judd and Williams, one «stray bay gelding, of a particular brand and value. Possibly the indictment would have been less objectionable, had it followed more -closely the language of the statute; but we think it sufficiently definite in charging the offense prohibited by the statute, and that the court erred in sustaining a motion to quash. The judgmerq is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

■Oseen, J.

The defendant below was indicted for willfully taking up and trading off, to Morgan Judd and Williams, one «stray bay gelding, of a particular brand and value. Possibly the indictment would have been less objectionable, had it followed more -closely the language of the statute; but we think it sufficiently definite in charging the offense prohibited by the statute, and that the court erred in sustaining a motion to quash. The judgmerq is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 Tex. 675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dunham-tex-1871.