State v. Dunham

203 N.W.2d 406, 295 Minn. 541, 1973 Minn. LEXIS 1331
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedJanuary 12, 1973
DocketNo. 43445
StatusPublished

This text of 203 N.W.2d 406 (State v. Dunham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Dunham, 203 N.W.2d 406, 295 Minn. 541, 1973 Minn. LEXIS 1331 (Mich. 1973).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant contends on this appeal from an order of the district court quashing a writ of habeas corpus that the state did not produce enough evidence at the preliminary hearing to establish probable cause for believing him guilty of the offense charged. After a careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not err in quashing the writ.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 N.W.2d 406, 295 Minn. 541, 1973 Minn. LEXIS 1331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dunham-minn-1973.