State v. Duncan

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Duncan

2000 Ohio 243, 89 Ohio St. 3d 522

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 3, 2000

Docket2000-0730

StatusPublished

This text of 2000 Ohio 243 (State v. Duncan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Duncan, 2000 Ohio 243, 89 Ohio St. 3d 522 (Ohio 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 89 Ohio St.3d 522.]

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. DUNCAN, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Duncan, 2000-Ohio-243.] Criminal procedure—R.C. 2967.28—Post-release control—Court of appeals’ judgment reversed on authority of Woods v. Telb, cause remanded to trial court for judgment consistent with Woods, and defendant’s conviction for escape reinstated. (No. 00-730—Submitted July 25, 2000—Decided August 3, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, No. C-990582. __________________ Michael K. Allen, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Philip R. Cummings, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is allowed. The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Woods v. Telb (2000), 89 Ohio St.3d 504, 733 N.E.2d 1103, the cause is remanded to the trial court for judgment consistent with Woods, and defendant’s conviction for escape is reinstated. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., dissents. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 89 Ohio St.3d 522.]

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. DUNCAN, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Duncan, 2000-Ohio-243.] Criminal procedure—R.C. 2967.28—Post-release control—Court of appeals’ judgment reversed on authority of Woods v. Telb, cause remanded to trial court for judgment consistent with Woods, and defendant’s conviction for escape reinstated. (No. 00-730—Submitted July 25, 2000—Decided August 3, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, No. C-990582. __________________ Michael K. Allen, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Philip R. Cummings, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is allowed. The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Woods v. Telb (2000), 89 Ohio St.3d 504, 733 N.E.2d 1103, the cause is remanded to the trial court for judgment consistent with Woods, and defendant’s conviction for escape is reinstated. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., dissents. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2000 Ohio 243, 89 Ohio St. 3d 522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-duncan-ohio-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack