State v. . Duncan

12 S.E. 382, 107 N.C. 818
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 5, 1890
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 12 S.E. 382 (State v. . Duncan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Duncan, 12 S.E. 382, 107 N.C. 818 (N.C. 1890).

Opinion

Avery, J.

after stating the facts: The affidavit required by the statute (The Code, §1235), must embody the statements: First, that the defendant is'wholly unable to give security for the costs; secondly, that he is advised by counsel that he has reasonable cause for the appeal prayed for; third, that the application is made in good faith.” State v. Moore, 93 N C., 500; State v. Jones, 93 N. C., 617. It is not a matter of discretion with the Court, but it is the right of the State to have an appeal dismissed where there is a failure to comply with either of the three essential requirements of the law. State v. Payne, 93 N. C., 613. The Solicitor is not authorized to waive compliance with it. State v. Moore, supra.

The affidavit is fatally defective, and the motion of the. Attorney General to dismiss must be granted.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. . Stafford
166 S.E. 734 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)
State v. . Marion
158 S.E. 158 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931)
State v. . Smith
67 S.E. 965 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1910)
State v. . Gatewood
34 S.E. 543 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 S.E. 382, 107 N.C. 818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-duncan-nc-1890.