State v. Duncan

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Duncan

564 So. 2d 316, 1990 La. LEXIS 1550, 1990 WL 85266

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 22, 1990

DocketNo. 90-K-0633

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 564 So. 2d 316 (State v. Duncan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Duncan, 564 So. 2d 316, 1990 La. LEXIS 1550, 1990 WL 85266 (La. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Duncan, Warren; — Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KA89 0303; Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 55007.

Granted. This case is remanded to the First Circuit, which is ordered to supplement the appellate record with a transcript or recording of the drug transaction offered by the defendant so that a review of the defendant’s assignment of error claiming insufficiency of the evidence may be made with the benefit of the entire trial record. La. Const. Art. I, § 19 (1974); La. C.Cr.P. art. 914.1(D). If supplementation is not possible through production or reconstruction of the tape recording, the court is free to consider whether or not the missing portion of the record is necessary for a full and fair review of this assignment of error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Duncan, Warren; — Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KA89 0303; Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 55007.

Granted. This case is remanded to the First Circuit, which is ordered to supplement the appellate record with a transcript or recording of the drug transaction offered by the defendant so that a review of the defendant’s assignment of error claiming insufficiency of the evidence may be made with the benefit of the entire trial record. La. Const. Art. I, § 19 (1974); La. C.Cr.P. art. 914.1(D). If supplementation is not possible through production or reconstruction of the tape recording, the court is free to consider whether or not the missing portion of the record is necessary for a full and fair review of this assignment of error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

564 So. 2d 316, 1990 La. LEXIS 1550, 1990 WL 85266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-duncan-la-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack