State v. Dunbar
This text of State v. Dunbar (State v. Dunbar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals 27424 15-NOV-2011 NO. 27424 03:51 PM
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
JOHN P. DUNBAR, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
(CR. NO. 04-1-0450(1))
ORDER
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ.)
Upon consideration of John P. Dunbar’s October 17, 2011
letter to the Chief Justice, which is treated as a motion for
reconsideration of the February 9, 2007 order rejecting the
application for a writ of certiorari, it appears that the motion
for reconsideration is not authorized by HRAP 40.1(h) (“Neither
acceptance nor rejection of an application for a writ of
certiorari shall be subject to a motion for reconsideration in
the supreme court. The rejection of an application for a writ of
certiorari shall be final.”). Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration is dismissed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, November 15, 2011. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.
/s/ James E. Duffy, Jr.
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Dunbar, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dunbar-haw-2011.