State v. Dula
320 S.E.2d 405, 312 N.C. 80, 1984 N.C. LEXIS 1773
Opinion
The Court of Appeals correctly held that the trial court did not commit error when it required the defendant to make restitution for the loss and damage caused by the defendant “arising out of’ the offense committed by her as provided by G.S. 15A-1343(d).
The decision of the Court of Appeals is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Dula, 320 S.E.2d 405, 312 N.C. 80, 1984 N.C. LEXIS 1773 (N.C. 1984).
320 S.E.2d 405 (State v. Dula) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Murphy
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2018
Commonwealth v. Palmer P.
61 Mass. App. Ct. 230 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 2004)
Moore v. State
673 A.2d 171 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1996)
State v. Froneberger
344 S.E.2d 344 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1986)