State v. Duhan
This text of 484 A.2d 468 (State v. Duhan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant was convicted on one count of disorderly conduct, one count of interfering with a police officer and one count of criminal mischief in the third degree.1 From the judgment rendered, she appealed to the Appellate Session of the Superior Court. That court set aside the judgment and remanded the matter to the trial court with direction to render a judgment of not guilty on the first count and for a new trial on the remaining two counts. On the granting of certification, the state appealed to the Supreme [25]*25Court, challenging the Appellate Session’s decision with respect to the first count only.2
On August 28, 1984, the Supreme Court held that the Appellate Session was in error when it ordered the entry of a judgment of not guilty on the first count. State v. Duhan, 194 Conn. 347, 481 A.2d 48 (1984). The Supreme Court set aside the judgment of the Appellate Session on that count and remanded the case to this court3 with direction to remand to the trial court for a new trial on count one.
Pursuant to the Supreme Court’s directive in State v. Duhan, supra, this case is remanded to the Superior Court for a new trial on count one.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
484 A.2d 468, 3 Conn. App. 24, 1984 Conn. App. LEXIS 720, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-duhan-connappct-1984.