State v. Dugan
89 A. 1135, 85 N.J.L. 730, 56 Vroom 730, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 210
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Kalisch in the Supreme Court.
■ For affirmance — The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Parker, Mintuen, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Congdon, White, Heppenhelmer, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Dugan, 89 A. 1135, 85 N.J.L. 730, 56 Vroom 730, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 210 (N.J. 1914).
89 A. 1135 (State v. Dugan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Wingler
135 A.2d 468 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1957)
State v. Janiec
95 A.2d 762 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)
State v. Moore
91 A.2d 342 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
State v. Neri
76 A.2d 915 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)