State v. Dugan
89 A. 1135, 85 N.J.L. 730, 56 Vroom 730, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 210
This text of 89 A. 1135 (State v. Dugan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Dugan, 89 A. 1135, 85 N.J.L. 730, 56 Vroom 730, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 210 (N.J. 1914).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Kalisch in the Supreme Court.
■ For affirmance — The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Parker, Mintuen, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Congdon, White, Heppenhelmer, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Wingler
135 A.2d 468 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1957)
State v. Janiec
95 A.2d 762 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)
State v. Moore
91 A.2d 342 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
State v. Neri
76 A.2d 915 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
89 A. 1135, 85 N.J.L. 730, 56 Vroom 730, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dugan-nj-1914.