State v. Dugan
48 A. 1118, 65 N.J.L. 684, 36 Vroom 684, 1901 N.J. LEXIS 161
This text of 48 A. 1118 (State v. Dugan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Dugan, 48 A. 1118, 65 N.J.L. 684, 36 Vroom 684, 1901 N.J. LEXIS 161 (N.J. 1901).
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Yan Syckel in that court. Ante p. 65.
For affirmance—-Ti-ie Chancellor, Dixon, Collins, Fort, G-arretson, Bogert, Krueger, Hendrickson, Adams, Yredenburgi-i, Yoorhees. 11.
For reversal—Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Quatro
122 A.2d 245 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
48 A. 1118, 65 N.J.L. 684, 36 Vroom 684, 1901 N.J. LEXIS 161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dugan-nj-1901.