State v. Dugan
48 A. 1118, 65 N.J.L. 684, 36 Vroom 684, 1901 N.J. LEXIS 161
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Yan Syckel in that court. Ante p. 65.
For affirmance—-Ti-ie Chancellor, Dixon, Collins, Fort, G-arretson, Bogert, Krueger, Hendrickson, Adams, Yredenburgi-i, Yoorhees. 11.
For reversal—Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Dugan, 48 A. 1118, 65 N.J.L. 684, 36 Vroom 684, 1901 N.J. LEXIS 161 (N.J. 1901).
48 A. 1118 (State v. Dugan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Quatro
122 A.2d 245 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)