State v. Duff

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Duff

501 S.W.3d 506, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1023, 2016 WL 6080415

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 18, 2016

DocketNo. ED 103457

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 501 S.W.3d 506 (State v. Duff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Duff, 501 S.W.3d 506, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1023, 2016 WL 6080415 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Terrance Duff (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgments following a jury trial convicting him of first-degree murder, in violation of Section 565.020 (RSMo. 2000), second-degree murder, in violation of Section 565.021, first-degree burglary, in violation of Section 569.160, and armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.015 for the shooting of Antoin-etta Davis (“Victim”) and her unborn child. Appellant was sentenced to life imprisonment without parole for first-degree murder, two sentences of life imprisonment for second-degree murder and armed criminal action, and 15 years’ imprisonment for first degree burglary, all of which were ordered to run consecutively. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by .a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Terrance Duff (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgments following a jury trial convicting him of first-degree murder, in violation of Section 565.020 (RSMo. 2000), second-degree murder, in violation of Section 565.021, first-degree burglary, in violation of Section 569.160, and armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.015 for the shooting of Antoin-etta Davis (“Victim”) and her unborn child. Appellant was sentenced to life imprisonment without parole for first-degree murder, two sentences of life imprisonment for second-degree murder and armed criminal action, and 15 years’ imprisonment for first degree burglary, all of which were ordered to run consecutively. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by .a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

501 S.W.3d 506, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1023, 2016 WL 6080415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-duff-moctapp-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack