State v. Dudley
870 S.W.2d 477, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 296, 1994 WL 50128
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Dudley. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1580 →
Opinion
ORDER
Defendant appeals his jury conviction for sale of a controlled substance and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm
The findings of fact issued by the motion court are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(2) and (5). We find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion and affirm by summary order. Rule 30.25(b). A memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision has been issued to the parties for their use only.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Dudley, 870 S.W.2d 477, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 296, 1994 WL 50128 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).
870 S.W.2d 477 (State v. Dudley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.