State v. Duchaine

2017 ND 224, 902 N.W.2d 515, 2017 N.D. LEXIS 231, 2017 WL 4159234
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 20, 2017
Docket20170037
StatusPublished

This text of 2017 ND 224 (State v. Duchaine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Duchaine, 2017 ND 224, 902 N.W.2d 515, 2017 N.D. LEXIS 231, 2017 WL 4159234 (N.D. 2017).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Wade Duchaine appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of burglary, puchaine argues the district court abused its discretion in denying his motion for a change of venue and the guilty verdict is not supported by sufficient evidence. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Lisa Fair McEvers Daniel J. Crothers Jerod E. Tufte Jon J. Jensen

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 ND 224, 902 N.W.2d 515, 2017 N.D. LEXIS 231, 2017 WL 4159234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-duchaine-nd-2017.