State v. D.S.

732 So. 2d 24, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5460, 1999 WL 247319
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. D.S.. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12811
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 28, 1999·No. No. 98-2219·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state appeals D.S.’s delinquency disposition order asserting error in the trial court’s withhold of adjudication and simultaneous imposition of a Level 2 commitment. We reverse.1

After D.S. pled no contest to several charges, the court withheld adjudication and ordered him committed to a Level 2 non-residential program. We agree with the state that the sentence imposed was illegal because when a court commits a juvenile to a non-residential facility under section 985.228, Florida Statutes (1997), it is required to adjudicate the juvenile delinquent.

Section 985.228(4), Florida Statutes (1997) allows a court to “in its discretion, ... withhold adjudication of delinquency and plac[e] the child in a community control program_” § 985.228(4), Fla. Stat. (1997). Under section 985.228(5), if the court “elects not to proceed under subsection (4), it shall incorporate that finding in an order of adjudication of delinquency entered in the case-” § 985.228, Fla. Stat. (1997) (emphasis supplied). Thus, under the statute, adjudication of delinquency must necessarily precede commitment.

On remand, the court may either withhold adjudication and place D.S. on community control, or adjudicate D.S. and either place him on community control or commit him.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DELL, POLEN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. D.S., 732 So. 2d 24, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5460, 1999 WL 247319 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

732 So. 2d 24 (State v. D.S.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Butler
719 So. 2d 344 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)