State v. D.S.
Opinion
The state appeals D.S.’s delinquency disposition order asserting error in the trial court’s withhold of adjudication and simultaneous imposition of a Level 2 commitment. We reverse.1
After D.S. pled no contest to several charges, the court withheld adjudication and ordered him committed to a Level 2 non-residential program. We agree with the state that the sentence imposed was illegal because when a court commits a juvenile to a non-residential facility under section 985.228, Florida Statutes (1997), it is required to adjudicate the juvenile delinquent.
Section 985.228(4), Florida Statutes (1997) allows a court to “in its discretion, ... withhold adjudication of delinquency and plac[e] the child in a community control program_” § 985.228(4), Fla. Stat. (1997). Under section 985.228(5), if the court “elects not to proceed under subsection (4), it shall incorporate that finding in an order of adjudication of delinquency entered in the case-” § 985.228, Fla. Stat. (1997) (emphasis supplied). Thus, under the statute, adjudication of delinquency must necessarily precede commitment.
On remand, the court may either withhold adjudication and place D.S. on community control, or adjudicate D.S. and either place him on community control or commit him.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
732 So. 2d 24 (State v. D.S.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.