State v. Drumgoole

Louisiana Court of Appeal

State v. Drumgoole

538 So. 2d 1014, 1988 WL 149126

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedApril 7, 1988

DocketNo. K88-369

StatusPublished

This text of 538 So. 2d 1014 (State v. Drumgoole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Drumgoole, 538 So. 2d 1014, 1988 WL 149126 (La. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

WRIT DENIED: Relator’s allegation that the prosecution made an improper reference, in his closing argument, to the fact that relator failed to testify in his own behalf is prematurely raised in this court since it was not urged by relator in his application to the district court. This court finds that the prosecution sufficiently proved by competent evidence the allegations charging relator as a habitual offender and that the trial judge did not err in finding the relator guilty of being a habitual offender. State v. Evans, 506 So.2d 1283 (La.App. 2 Cir.1987).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WRIT DENIED: Relator’s allegation that the prosecution made an improper reference, in his closing argument, to the fact that relator failed to testify in his own behalf is prematurely raised in this court since it was not urged by relator in his application to the district court. This court finds that the prosecution sufficiently proved by competent evidence the allegations charging relator as a habitual offender and that the trial judge did not err in finding the relator guilty of being a habitual offender. State v. Evans, 506 So.2d 1283 (La.App. 2 Cir.1987).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

538 So. 2d 1014, 1988 WL 149126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-drumgoole-lactapp-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack