State v. Driscoll

Supreme Court of Iowa

State v. Driscoll

76 Iowa 770

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Driscoll. Read the opinion of the Court — 72 Iowa 583 →

Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided July 1, 1888·Published

Opinion

Robinson, J.

— The defendant was convicted of the crime of larceny in a building in the daytime, and appealed from the judgment rendered. The cause was submitted in this court on a transcript of the judgment, appeal bond, notice of appeal, and an affidavit of defendant to the effect that he does not desire to further prosecute the appeal. We discover no error in the proceedings in the district court, and its judgment is therefore

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson, J.

— The defendant was convicted of the crime of larceny in a building in the daytime, and appealed from the judgment rendered. The cause was submitted in this court on a transcript of the judgment, appeal bond, notice of appeal, and an affidavit of defendant to the effect that he does not desire to further prosecute the appeal. We discover no error in the proceedings in the district court, and its judgment is therefore

Affirmed.

State v. Driscoll, 76 Iowa 770 (iowa 1888).

Pincite

76 Iowa 770 (State v. Driscoll) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.