State v. Dreyer

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Dreyer

345 N.W.2d 249, 1984 Minn. LEXIS 1274

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedMarch 16, 1984

DocketC3-82-1499

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 345 N.W.2d 249 (State v. Dreyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Dreyer, 345 N.W.2d 249, 1984 Minn. LEXIS 1274 (Mich. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

KELLEY, Justice.

Defendant was found guilty in district court of possession of marijuana and possession of marijuana with intent to sell and was sentenced to pay a fine and to serve a prison sentence. Execution of the sentence was stayed, and defendant was placed on probation with conditions. We affirm.

Defendant raises a number of fourth amendment issues on appeal, some of them contingent on our deciding the issue of the validity of a so-called garbage search in defendant’s favor. The garbage search was conducted without a warrant on February 25, 1982, and involved the search of garbage which had been placed on the curb for routine collection. Search of the garbage resulted in the discovery of marijuana residue, which in turn led to the issuance of a warrant to search the “premises” described as “110 South Western Avenue, a two-story white wood frame house with green trim.” The issue of the validity of the garbage search is controlled by State v. Oquist, 327 N.W.2d 587 (Minn.1982), where we held on similar facts that the police there did not violate the defendant’s fourth amendment rights.

Defendant’s remaining contention is that the police exceeded the scope of the subsequently-issued warrant in searching the garage attached to defendant’s house, the garage being where the police found the marijuana. We hold that the garage was part of the “premises” described in the warrant. This holding is consistent with cases from other jurisdictions. The cases are collected at 2 W. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 4.10(a) (1978).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KELLEY, Justice.

Defendant was found guilty in district court of possession of marijuana and possession of marijuana with intent to sell and was sentenced to pay a fine and to serve a prison sentence. Execution of the sentence was stayed, and defendant was placed on probation with conditions. We affirm.

Defendant raises a number of fourth amendment issues on appeal, some of them contingent on our deciding the issue of the validity of a so-called garbage search in defendant’s favor. The garbage search was conducted without a warrant on February 25, 1982, and involved the search of garbage which had been placed on the curb for routine collection. Search of the garbage resulted in the discovery of marijuana residue, which in turn led to the issuance of a warrant to search the “premises” described as “110 South Western Avenue, a two-story white wood frame house with green trim.” The issue of the validity of the garbage search is controlled by State v. Oquist, 327 N.W.2d 587 (Minn.1982), where we held on similar facts that the police there did not violate the defendant’s fourth amendment rights.

Defendant’s remaining contention is that the police exceeded the scope of the subsequently-issued warrant in searching the garage attached to defendant’s house, the garage being where the police found the marijuana. We hold that the garage was part of the “premises” described in the warrant. This holding is consistent with cases from other jurisdictions. The cases are collected at 2 W. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 4.10(a) (1978).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

345 N.W.2d 249, 1984 Minn. LEXIS 1274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dreyer-minn-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack