State v. Drew

72 P.3d 1064, 188 Or. App. 665, 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 897
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided July 16, 2003·No. 0103-32132; A118050·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

*666 PER CURIAM

The parties jointly move for an order vacating the judgment and remanding this case for resentencing. ORS 138.227(1). 1 We grant the motion.

Defendant was convicted on three separate counts, including the unlawful use of a weapon, ORS 166.220, which is a Class C felony. Pursuant to ORS 161.610(4)(a), the trial court imposed a sentence of five years’ imprisonment and 24 months’ post-prison supervision. That sentence exceeds the statutory maximum of five years for a Class C felony because a sentence includes incarceration and post-prison supervision. Pursuant to ORS 138.222(5), the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for resentencing.

Joint motion for order vacating judgment granted; judgment vacated; case remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

1

ORS 138.227(1) provides, in part:

“Upon joint motion of the parties to an appeal in a criminal action, the court may vacate the judgment * * * and remand the matter to the trial court to reconsider the judgment * * *. Upon remand, the trial court shall have jurisdiction to enter a revised judgment or order.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Drew, 72 P.3d 1064, 188 Or. App. 665, 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 897 (Or. Ct. App. 2003).

72 P.3d 1064 (State v. Drew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Angell
113 P.3d 988 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2005)
State v. Galvin
97 P.3d 696 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2004)