State v. Draper
Opinion
ORDER
Timothy Draper appeals his conviction following jury trial for the class B felony of committing violence against an offender, section 217.385, RSMo 2000, and sentence of five years imprisonment. Mr. Draper raises one point on appeal. He contends that the trial court erred in allowing Cynthia Rushefsky’s testimony regarding a possible motive for Mr. Draper’s actions because there was no evidence Mr. Draper had any knowledge of the facts constituting the motive to which Ms. Rushefsky testified and thus the testimony was irrelevant. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
169 S.W.3d 927 (State v. Draper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.