State v. Draper

169 S.W.3d 927, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1298, 2005 WL 2124497
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 6, 2005
DocketWD 64496
StatusPublished

This text of 169 S.W.3d 927 (State v. Draper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Draper, 169 S.W.3d 927, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1298, 2005 WL 2124497 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Timothy Draper appeals his conviction following jury trial for the class B felony of committing violence against an offender, section 217.385, RSMo 2000, and sentence of five years imprisonment. Mr. Draper raises one point on appeal. He contends that the trial court erred in allowing Cynthia Rushefsky’s testimony regarding a possible motive for Mr. Draper’s actions because there was no evidence Mr. Draper had any knowledge of the facts constituting the motive to which Ms. Rushefsky testified and thus the testimony was irrelevant. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Kansas City v. Tyson
169 S.W.3d 927 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 S.W.3d 927, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1298, 2005 WL 2124497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-draper-moctapp-2005.