State v. Dozier

200 S.E.2d 348, 19 N.C. App. 740, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1754
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided November 14, 1973·No. 7326SC671·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

VAUGHN, Judge.

Defendant’s sole contention on appeal, that the trial court erred “in its charge to the jury, when the Court charged on a lesser included offense, where there was no competent evidence to substantiate the charge,” is without merit. Any person who breaks or enters any building described in G.S. 14-54, with intent to commit any felony or larceny therein, is guilty of a felony. A wrongful breaking or entering into such building, without the intent to commit any felony therein, is a misdemeanor, a lesser included offense within the meaning of G.S. 15-170.

Here, as in State v. Jones, 264 N.C. 134, 141 S.E. 2d 27, evidence as to defendant’s alleged felonious intent was circumstantial. It was not only proper to instruct as to the lesser included offense, it would have been prejudicial error to fail to so instruct. State v. Jones, supra.

No error.

Judges Morris and Baley concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Dozier, 200 S.E.2d 348, 19 N.C. App. 740, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1754 (N.C. Ct. App. 1973).

200 S.E.2d 348 (State v. Dozier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Lawing
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2015
State v. McMillan
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2014
State v. Crump
608 S.E.2d 416 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)
State v. Hannah
286 S.E.2d 363 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1982)
State v. Boone
256 S.E.2d 683 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1979)
State v. Dozier
201 S.E.2d 690 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1974)