State v. Doyle

477 S.W.3d 738, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1345, 2015 WL 9474248
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 29, 2015
DocketWD 78120
StatusPublished

This text of 477 S.W.3d 738 (State v. Doyle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Doyle, 477 S.W.3d 738, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1345, 2015 WL 9474248 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

ORDER

Per curiam:

Thomas R. Doyle appeals his conviction of child molestation in the first degree following a jury trial. Doyle asserts that the trial court erred in excluding evidence and in allowing the State to make a rebuttal argument that asked the jury to draw an adverse inference from the absence of the excluded evidence. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
477 S.W.3d 738, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1345, 2015 WL 9474248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-doyle-moctapp-2015.